Some players just create drama the moment they step to the plate.There's plenty of them and they make the game theater. They are the players you either love or hate.
Then there's Bryce Harper.
Finding a player more controversial before even making his major league debut would be difficult.
Harper's development was intensely covered and discussed from the time he was a young boy. The years he spent getting to pro-ball were brief after he elected to get his GED to get an early jump on college. He smashed records for College of Southern Nevada. The outfielder finally made it to professional baseball in 2010, first in the Arizona Fall League, then in 2011 for Class-A Hagerstown before a July 4th promotion to Double-A Harrisburg. National media coverage reached epic proportions (goes without saying, right?). Fans were on high, anticipating an announcement that he would make the Nationals 2012 major league roster out of spring training. He did not.
Instead, Harper headed to Triple-A Syracuse. He was hitting .250 with one home run, when Ryan Zimmerman went down with an oblique injury.
Harper's nationally televised debut at Dodger Stadium was a fine success. He doubled in his third at-bat and got an RBR sac-fly in the ninth. He was unfazed by his surroundings or the hideous reaction of Dodgers fans, booing him when he stepped to the plate for the first time.
How did we not see it coming? Then again, maybe Harper did.
On May 6th, Phillies pitcher Cole Hamels took the mound. He hit Harper in the back in the first inning. Unfazed again, Harper took his base.
And that would've been fine. Nationals fans probably could've lived with that. Baseball would've went on.
But Hamels was willing to add to the drama. Post-game, to the delight of reporters, he admitted he hit him on purpose.
'Beaning' is no secret practice in baseball. It isn't viewed as a free-for-all or taken lightly. If a ball is aimed at a player at the plate, there's a reason. Could be he's hogging the plate. The pitcher brushes him back and it's understood. There will more than likely be a retaliation and a warning to both benches from the homeplate umpire. It's understood. If there's animosity from past incidents or tension between two players facing each other, tempers might stir. Also understood.
There is no reason for Hamels taking aim at Harper.
Sure, there's plenty of excuses. You can make a case for it. But there's nothing backing the argument up.
Beaning is a gentleman's agreement. And that was no act of a gentleman. Worse, it was the action of a hot-head with a World Series ring that is old enough, seasoned enough, too damn good, for such petty tactics.
Confessing to intentionally hitting Harper was Hamels second mistake. And it was just as much of a misfire and carried consequences. Phillies manager Charlie Manuel told the press he wished he hadn't admitted to doing it. Ruben Amaro Jr., the team's GM, expressed disappointment. He made clear that was not the philosophy the organization ascribed to. Hamels would be suspended and Nationals GM Mike Rizzo, publicly calling Harper 'gutless', was fined.
Amaro and Manuel played plenty of baseball in their lives and understand fully that pitchers' throw at hitters intentionally sometimes. And they know why.
Hamels actions were only part of the problem. The fact that he did it was largely viewed as unfair and unnecessary. But the confession is what shocked the masses. Somehow, that made the whole thing worse. If we accept that beaning is an unwritten rule of baseball, we also must respect that there's some unwritten ground rules.
Hamels intent appeared to be inspired by a desire to shake a hotly-hyped prospect up and give him a not so-welcome to the big leagues. Actually, you can make your case for Hamels. No one in baseball can claim innocence. But the practice has it's place and time.
In this case, Hamels belief that he should aim that ball at the nineteen-year old rookie's head then gloat, and the public belief by many that Harper was deserving, is proof we've become ridiculous.
Recent Comments