My blog is reserved for Minor League Baseball coverage and, once in awhile, I address something more personal. It's usually not football-related, but this is an exception. This isn't exactly about football. Thank you for reading. Please feel free to share your comments here or on Twitter @heelsonthefield.
Glorifying sports and athletes accomplishments is a beloved pasttime. There is nothing quite like watching legends born, whether it's a moment in one game or a long career filled with victories.
The legend of Joe Paterno is a Pennsylvania institution. The Penn State University football coach has secured his place in the history books throughout his 46-year career with the school. Unfortunately, he now also has a place in the story of a despicable crime against innocent children. It is a matter of opinion how much responsiblity he bears in the alleged sex-abuse assistant coach Jerry Sandusky committed against numerous children. In 2002 he was informed of an incident involving a ten year old child. After he was told by graduate coach Mike McQueary that an incident of a 'sexual nature' had occurred, he then informed his superiors. And that was apparently all he thought he needed to do. If he knew of the horrific details - of a boy being raped in a shower at Penn State - that would be an inconceivable act of moral failure. If he didn't know those details, the very idea that anything was going on should have alarmed him. He should have fought for the truth to be revealed as hard as he fought to win a football game.
The fact is, Paterno did what he was obligated to do within the confines of the school. But that was simply not enough.
If he knew even a small amount of information, he should have done more. If he knew there was even a possibility that this was going on, he should have done more. So should anyone else with knowledge of a child being molested. When Paterno found out something was going on, nothing was stopping him from following through and making sure the situation was being taken care of. Penn State was protecting themselves, but they weren't protecting innocent children. Not to mention innocent children involved in Sandusky's Second Mile program, created to help underpriveleged children.
Penn State Athletic Director Athletic Director Timothy Curley and Gary Schultz, the university's senior vice president for finance and business perjured themselves. Paterno is not part of that and no one is implying he is. But if they are found guilty on a charge of failing to report a crime, it would be difficult not to shine the spotlight on Paterno's own failure.
Trying to rationalize Paterno's actions is an example of how we lose our senses when the actions are committed by an athletic hero.
Joe Paterno did the wrong thing. If he were some bum off the street that saw or heard molestation of a child was occuring, it's safe to say no one would bother to defend him. And try to imagine that the child being assaulted was your own. It is also safe to say you wouldn't give a hoot about a historic football program or dismiss the legendary coach's actions. As more victims come forward, concern should be with them and what they were subjected to.
We are willing to overlook or forgive athletic heroes. Sports creates a community of believers, like a religion. We worship together. We cry together. We hold hands and say a Hail Mary when the chips are down. We also find it very difficult to not worship false idols.
There are a lot of questions about Paterno's knowledge. He's not being accused of the crimes Sandusky is, but his response to those crimes is difficult to reason. The fact that Sandusky was allowed to continue his association with the school after the board was alerted is baffling.
We can all lament the death of a belief. That's fine. Mourn the loss of what was a golden reputation. But that reputation was tarnished by a choice. Those at Penn State who looked the other way have no one to blame but themselves.
At this point, the questions are numerous. Why didn't Paterno do more? Why didn't the school do more? How can one feel squared up morally when a child molester is not being investigated and apprehended? Why was Sandusky not reported to law enforcement in 2002? Why didn't the school put the safety of their children and their own glowing history before any loyalty to Sandusky? And if loyalty was not the reason, what possible reason could they have? A predator was given the freedom to harm children. What is their excuse?
If there are answers, let's hear them.
So far, no answers we've heard have been enough.
But the reality is that no one in this situation is a victim but the children Penn State and the employees of their university failed to protect. In it's failure, they created a sanctuary for a criminal.
Recent Comments